Chapter Three

            In the reading from chapter three, we learned about arguments based on character, pertaining to ethical appeals. These arguments are commonly known as based on "ethos". Because of the sense of trust that comes along with it, arguments require strong, ethical appeals. We often find appeals or arguments about character presented in three ways. 1. A person/group does/doesn’t have the authority to speak to this issue 2. A person/group is/isn’t trustworthy or credible on this issue 3. A person/group does/doesn’t have good motives for addressing this subject. These are the three most common ways we see character turn on claims.

            When reading, our book says we have the right to ponder the authority of the author. Our book then goes on to explain how a certain level of education or degree often grants people the necessary authority to be writing on such a subject. Another way of insisting you are credible is by mentioning occupation/employers and how many years of experience you have.

            Whether you are a renowned Nobel Prize winner or a bagger at Walmart, my opinion is… If you are going to make a claim, or comment, be able to back yourself up. This often comes up at my house during family discussions after holidays or gatherings. My family is full of big mouth New Yorkers who all want their opinion to be heard. Whether we are discussing politics, religion, or the appropriateness of my sister’s dress for mass, I believe if you are going to put your “two cents” in, I want to specifically know why, or how you come to that understanding. I have family members who barely have their high school degree, and then I have aunts and uncles who are doctors and lawyers. When it comes to certain discussions, I personally don’t care what level of degree you have, I care about how you are able to back up your claims, and where you are obtaining your information.After reading this chapter, the same can be said for any argument or claim that you are reading.